Sediment yield model implementation based on check dam infill stratigraphy in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment

Soil loss and sediment transport in Mediterranean areas are driven by complex non-linear processes which have been only partially understood. Distributed models can be very helpful tools for understanding the catchment-scale phenomena which lead to soil erosion and sediment transport. In this study, a modelling approach is proposed to reproduce and evaluate erosion and sediment yield processes in a Mediterranean catchment (Rambla del Poyo, Valencia, Spain). Due to the lack of sediment transport records for model calibration and validation, a detailed description of the alluvial stratigraphy infilling a check dam that drains a 12.9 km(2) sub-catchment was used as indirect information of sediment yield data. These dam infill sediments showed evidences of at least 15 depositional events (floods) over the time period 1990-2009. The TETIS model, a distributed conceptual hydrological and sediment model, was coupled to the Sediment Trap Efficiency for Small Ponds (STEP) model for reproducing reservoir retention, and it was calibrated and validated using the sedimentation volume estimated for the depositional units associated with discrete runoff events. The results show relatively low net erosion rates compared to other Mediterranean catchments (0.136 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1)), probably due to the extensive outcrops of limestone bedrock, thin soils and rather homogeneous vegetation cover. The simulated sediment production and transport rates offer model satisfactory results, further supported by in-site palaeohydrological evidences and spatial validation using additional check dams, showing the great potential of the presented data assimilation methodology for the quantitative analysis of sediment dynamics in ungauged Mediterranean basins.This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research projects FLOOD-MED (ref. CGL2008-06474-C02-01/02), SCARCE-CONSOLIDER (ref. CSD2009-00065), CLARIES (ref. CGL2011-29176) and ECO-TETIS (ref. CGL2011-28776-C02-01). The hydrometeorological data was provided by the Automatic Hydrological Information System of the Spanish Jucar River Authority (SAIH - Confederacion Hidrografica del Jucar). Wildfires information was provided by the Regional Government. We would also like to thank Artemi Cerda and the three anonymous referees for their useful comments which helped to improve the scientific quality of the paper.Bussi, G.; Rodríguez-Lloveras, X.; Francés, F.; Benito, G.; Sanchez-Moya, Y.; Sopeña, A. (2013). Sediment yield model implementation based on check dam infill stratigraphy in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 17:3339-3354. doi:10.5194/hess-17-3339-2013S3339335417Ackermann, W. C. and Corinth, R. L.: An empirical equation for reservoir sedimentation, in Symposium of Bari (Italy), International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 59, 359–366, Bari (Italy), 1962.Alatorre, L. C., Beguería, S., and García-Ruiz, J. M.: Regional scale modeling of hillslope sediment delivery: A case study in the Barasona Reservoir watershed (Spain) using WATEM/SEDEM, J. Hydrol., 391, 109-123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.010, 2010.Alatorre, L. C., Beguer\\'ia, S., Lana-Renault, N., Navas, A., and Garc\\'ia-Ruiz, J. M.: Soil erosion and sediment delivery in a mountain catchment under scenarios of land use change using a spatially distributed numerical model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1321–1334, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1321-2012, 2012.Andrés-Doménech, I., Múnera, J. C., Francés, F., and Marco, J. B.: Coupling urban event-based and catchment continuous modelling for combined sewer overflow river impact assessment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2057-2010, 2010.Andreu, V., Imeson, A. C., and Rubio, J. L.: Temporal changes in soil aggregates and water erosion after a wildfire in a Mediterranean pine forest, Catena, 44, 69–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00177-6, 2001.Antolín, C.: El suelo como recurso natural en la Comunitat Valenciana, Consellería de Territorio y Vivienda, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia (Spain), 1998.Avendaño Salas, C., Cobo Rayán, R., Gómez Montaña, J., and Sanz Montero, M.: Procedimiento para evaluar la degradación específica (erosión) de cuencas de embalses a partir de los sedimientos acumulados en los mismos. Aplicación al estudio de embalses españoles, Ingeniería Civil, 99, 51–58, 1995.Avendaño Salas, N., Sanz Montero, M., Cobo Rayán, R., and Gómez Montaña, J.: Sediment yield at Spanish reservoirs and its relationship with the drainage basin area, Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of Large Dams, Florence, ICOLD (International Committee on Large Dams), Florence, 863–874, 1997.Baeza, M. J., Valdecantos, A., Alloza, J. A., and Vallejo, V. R.: Human disturbance and environmental factors as drivers of long-term post-fire regeneration patterns in Mediterranean forests, J. Veg. Sci., 18,, 243–252, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02535.x, 2007.Baker, V.: Paleoflood hydrology: Origin, progress, prospects, Geomorphology, 101, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.016, 2008.Bangqi Hu, Zuosheng Yang, Houjie Wang, Xiaoxia Sun, Naishuang Bi, and Guogang Li: Sedimentation in the Three Gorges Dam and the future trend of Changjiang (Yangtze River) sediment flux to the sea, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2253–2264, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2253-2009, 2009.Bellin, N., Vanacker, V., Van Wesemael, B., Solé-Benet, A., and Bakker, M.: Natural and anthropogenic controls on soil erosion in the Internal Betic Cordillera (southeast Spain), Catena, 87, 190–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.05.022, 2011.Benito, G., Rico, M., Sánchez-Moya, Y., Sopeña, A., Thorndycraft, V. R., and Barriendos M.: The impact of late Holocene climatic variability and land use change on the flood hydrology of the Guadalentín River, southeast Spain, Global Planet. Change, 70, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.11.007, 2010.Boix-Fayos, C., Martínez-Mena, M., Calvo-Cases, A., Castillo, V., and Albaladejo, J.: Concise review of interrill erosion studies in SE Spain (Alicante and Murcia): erosion rates and progress of knowledge from the 1980s, Land Degrad. Dev., 16, 517–528, https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.706, 2005.Boix-Fayos, C., De Vente, J., Martínez-Mena, M., Barberá, G., and Castillo, V.: The impact of land use change and check-dams on catchment sediment yield, Hydrol. Process., 22, 4922–4935, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7115, 2008.Brown, C: Discussion of sedimentation in reservoir, In: Witzig J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 69, 1493–1500, 1943.Brune, G. M.: Trap efficiency of reservoirs, Trans. AGU, 34, 407–418, 1953.Callander, R. A. and Duder, J. N.: Reservoir sedimentation in the Rangitaiki River, New Zealand Engineering, 34, 208–215, 1979.Camarasa Belmonte, A. M. and Segura Beltrán, F.: Flood events in Mediterranean ephemeral streams (ramblas) in Valencia region, Spain, Catena, 45, 229–249, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00146-1, 2001.Campo, J., Andreu, V., Gimeno-Garcia, E., González, O., and Rubio, J. L.: Occurrence of soil erosion after repeated experimental fires in a Mediterranean environment, Geomorphology, 82, 376–387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.05.014, 2006.Cerdà, A.: Seasonal changes of the infiltration rates in a Mediterranean scrubland on limestone, J. Hydrol., 198, 209–225, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03295-7, 1997.Cerdà, A.: Soil aggregate stability under different Mediterranean vegetation types, Catena, 32, 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(98)00041-1, 1998a.Cerdà, A.: Changes in overland flow and infiltration after a rangeland fire in a Mediterranean scrubland, Hydrol. Process., 12, 1031–1042, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980615)12:7 3.0.CO;2-V, 1998bCerdà, A.: Post-fire dynamics of erosional processes under Mediterranean climatic conditions, Z. Geomorphologie, 42, 373–398, 1998c.Cerdà, A. and Doerr, S. H.: The effect of ash and needle cover on surface runoff and erosion in the immediate post-fire period, Catena, 74, 256–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.03.010, 2008.Cerdà, A. and Lasanta, T.: Long-term erosional responses after fire in the Central Spanish Pyrenees, Catena, 60, 59–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2004.09.006, 2005.Chen, C.: Design of sediment retention basins, in Proceedings, National Symposium on Urban Hydrology and Sediment Control, 285–298, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 1975.Cheng, Y.: Sediment discharge from a storm-water retention pond, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 134, 606–612, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:5(606), 2008.Coulthard, T. J., Kirkby, M. J., and Macklin, M.G.: Non-linearity and spatial resolution in a cellular automaton model of a small upland basin, Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci., 2, 257-264, 1998.De Vente, J., Poesen, J., and Verstraeten, G.: The application of semi-quantitative methods and reservoir sedimentation rates for the prediction of basin sediment yield in Spain, J. Hydrol., 305, 63–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.030, 2005.De Vente, J., Poesen, J., Verstraeten, G., Van Rompaey, A., and Govers, G.: Spatially distributed modelling of soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales in Spain, Global Planet. Change, 60, 393–415, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.05.002, 2008.Dissmeyer, G. E. and Foster, G. R.: A guide for predicting sheet and rill erosion on forest land, USDA, Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta, Ga. (USA), 1984.Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015–1031, https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985, 1992.Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol., 158, 265–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4, 1994.Duck, R. and McManus, J.: Sedimentation in natural and artificial Impoundments: an indicator of evolving climate, land use and dynamic conditions, in: Geomorphology and Sedimentology of Lakes and Reservoirs, edited by: McManus J. and Duck R., Wiley, 1993.Engelund, F. and Hansen, E.: A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams, Monogr, Denmark Tech Univ., Hydraul Lab, 1967.Farnham, C. W., Beer, C. E., and Heinemann, H.: Evaluation of factors affecting reservoir sediment deposition, in Symposium of Garda (Italy): Hydrology of Lakes and Reservoirs, International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication, 747–758, Garda (Italy), 1966.Foster, I.: Lakes and Reservoirs in the Sediment Delivery System: Reconstructing Sediment Yields, in: Soil erosion and sediment redistribution in river catchments. Measurement, Modelling and Management, edited by: Owens P. and Collins A., Biddles Ltd, King's Lynn, p. 328, https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990507.0128, 2006.Foster, I. and Walling, D.: Using reservoir deposits to reconstruct changing sediment yields and sources in the catchment of the Old Mill Reservoir, South Devon, UK, over the past 50 years, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 39, 347–368, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669409492755, 1994.Francés, F., Vélez, J. J., Vélez, J. I., and Puricelli, M.: Distributed modelling of large basins for a real time flood forecasting system in Spain, Proceedings Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modelling Conference, Gan, TY and Biftu, Las Vegas, 3513–3524, 2002.Francés, F., Vélez, J. I., and Vélez J. J.: Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 332, 226–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.032, 2007.Francés, F., García-Bartual, R., and Bussi, G.: High return period annual maximum reservoir water level quantiles estimation using synthetic generated flood events, in Risk Analysis, Dam Safety, Dam Security and Critical Infrastructure Management, 185–190, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2011.Gallart, F., Balasch, C., Regüés, D., Soler, M., and Castelltort, X.: Catchment dynamics in a Mediterranean mountain environment: the Vallcebre research basins (South Eastern Pyrenees), II Erosion and sediment dynamics, Catchment dynamics and river processes: latest research with examples from the Mediterranean climate regions, Elsevier, 17–29, 2005.Geiger, A. F.: Sediment yields from small watersheds in the United States, 11th General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vol. 1, 269–276, Toronto (Canada), 1957.González-Hidalgo, J. C., Peña-Monné, J. L., and De Luis, M.: A review of daily soil erosion in Western Mediterranean areas, Catena, 71, 193–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.03.005, 2007.Grauso, S., Fattoruso, G., Crocetti, G., and Montanari, A.: Estimating the suspended sediment yield in a river network by means of geomorphic parameters and regression relationships, Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci., 12, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1937-2009, 2008.Johnson, B. E., Julien, P. Y., Molnar, D. K., and Watson, C. C.: The two-dimensional upland erosion model CASC2D-SED, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 36, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04246.x, 2000.Julien, P. Y.: Erosion and sedimentation, second edition, Cambridge University Press, 2010.Julien, P. and Simons, D. B.: Sediment transport capacity of overland flow, Transactions of the ASAE, 1985.Jolly, J.: A proposed method for accurately calculating sediment yields from reservoir deposition volumes, Proceedings of the Exeter Symposium, IAHS Publ. No 37, 1982.Kilinc, M. and Richardson, E. V.: Mechanics of soil erosion from overland flow generated by simulated rainfall, Colorado State University, Hydrology Papers, 1973.Kirkby, M., Irvine, B., Jones, R., and Govers G.: The PESERA coarse scale erosion model for Europe. I. Model rationale and implementation, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 1293–1306, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01072.x, 2008.Kochel, R. and Baker, V.: Paleoflood Hydrology, Science, 215, 353–361, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.215.4531.353, 1982.Kosmas, C., Danalatos, N. G., Cammeraat, L. H., Chabart, M., Diamantopoulos, J., Farand, R., Gutierrez, L., Jacob, A., Marques, H., Martinez-Fernandez, J., Mizara, A., Moustakas, N., Nicolau, J. M., Oliveros, C., Pinna, G., Puddu, R., Puigdefabregas, J., Roxo, M., Simao, A., Stamou, G., Tomasi, N., Usai, D., and Vacca, A.: The effect of land use on runoff and soil erosion rates under Mediterranean conditions, Catena, 29, 45–59, 1997.Lane, E. and Koelzer, V.: Density of sediments deposited in reservoirs, Rep. No. 9 of a Study of Methods Used in Measurement and Analysis of Sediment Loads in Streams, 1943.Le Roux, J. and Roos, Z.: The rate of soil erosion in the Wuras Dam catchment calculated from sediments trapped in the dam, Z. Geomorphol, Suppl. 26, 315–329, 1982.Machado, M. J., Benito, G., Barriendos, M., and Rodrigo, F. S.: 500 years of rainfall variability and extreme hydrological events in southeastern Spain drylands, J. Arid Environ., 75, 1244–1253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.02.002, 2011.McManus, J. and Duck, R: Sediment yield estimated from reservoir siltation in the Ochil Hills, Scotland, Earth Surf. Proc. Land, 10, 193–200, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290100211, 1985.Montoya, J. J.: Desarrollo de un modelo conceptual de producción, transporte y depósito de sedimentos, Phd Thesis. Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain), 2008.Morales de la Cruz M. and Francés, F.: Hydrological modelling of the "Sierra de las Minas" in Guatemala, by using a conceptual distributed model and considering the lack of data, WITpress, 97–108, 2008.Moriasi, D., Arnold, J., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R., Harme, R., and Veith, T.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, T. ASAE, 50, 885–900, 2007.Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models – Part 1 – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.Nehyba, S., Nývlt., D., Schkade, U., Kirchner, G., and Francu, E.: Depositional rates and dating techniques of modern deposits in the Brno reservoir (Czech Republic) during the last 70 years, J. Paleolimnol., 45, 41–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-010-9478-5, 2011.Neil, D. and Mazari, R.: Sediment yield mapping using small dam sedimentation surveys, Southern Tablelands, New South Wales, Catena, 20, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(93)90026-L, 1993.Ogden, F. L. and Heilig, A.: Two-dimensional watershed-scale erosion modeling with CASC2D, Landscape Erosion and Evolution Modeling, (RS Harmon and WW Doe III, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, ISBN 0-306-4618-6, 2001.Phillips, C. J. and Nelson, C. S.: Sedimentation in an artifical lake – Lake Matahina, Bay of Plenty, New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh, 15, 459–473, https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1981.9515938, 1981.Piest, R. F., Bradford, J. M., and Wyatt, G. M.: Soil erosion and sediment transport from gullies, J. Hydr. Eng. Div-ASCE, 101, 65–80, 1975.Prosser, I. P. and Rustomji, P.: Sediment transport capacity relations for overland flow, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 24, 179–193, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330002400202, 2000.Prosser, I. and Williams, L.: The effect of wildfire on runoff and erosion in native Eucalyptus forest, Hydrol. Process., 12, 251–265, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199802)12:2< 251::AID-HYP574>3.0.CO;2-4, 1998.Rey-Benayas, J. M., Martins, A., Nicolau, J. M., and Schulz, J.: Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2, 057, https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20072057, 2007.Roering, J. J., Kirchner, J. W., and Dietrich, W. E.: Evidence for nonlinear, diffusive sediment transport on hillslopes and implications for landscape morphology, Water Resour. Res., 35, 853–870, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900090, 1999.Rohel, J. W.: Sediment source areas, delivery ratios, and influencing morphological factors, in Symposium of Bari (Italy), International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 59, 202–213, Bari (Italy), 1962.Rojas, R.: GIS-based upland erosion modeling, geovisualization and grid size effects on erosion simulations with CASC2D-SED, PhD Thesis, Colorado State University, 2002.Romero-Díaz, A., Alonso-Sarriá, F., and Martínez-Lloris, M.: Erosion rates obtained from check-dam sedimentation (SE Spain). A multi-method comparison, Catena, 71, 172–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.05.011, 2007.Rubio, J. L., Sánchez, J., and Forteza, J.: Proyecto LUCDEME. Mapa de suelos de la Comunidad Valenciana, 1995.Rulli, M., Spada, M., Bozzi, S., Bocchiola, D. and Rosso, R.: Modelling sediment yield in burned areas, in: Sediment budgets: proceedings of the International Symposium on Sediment Budgets: held during the Seventh Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), edited by: Horowitz, A. and Walling, D., IAHS Publ. No 292, Foz do Iguaço (Brazil), 162–170, 2005.Salazar, S., Francés, F., Komma, J., Blume, T., Francke, T., Bronstert, A., and Blöschl, G.: A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of flood management measures based on the concept of "retaining water in the landscape" in different European hydro-climatic regions, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 3287–3306, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3287-2012, 2013.Saxton, K. E. and Rawls, W. J.: Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 1569–1578, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117, 2006.Shakesby, R.: Post-wildfire soil erosion in the Mediterranean: Review and future research directions, Earth-Sci. Rev., 105, 71–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.001, 2011.Shumm, S. and Lichty, R.: Time, space and causality in geomorphology, Am. J. Sci., 263, 110–119, https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.263.2.110, 1965.Sougnez, N., Van Wesemael, B., and Vanacker, V.: Low erosion rates measured for steep, sparsely vegetated catchments in southeast Spain, Catena, 84, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.08.010, 2011.Van den Wall Blake, G.: Siltation and soil erosion survey in Zimbabwe, in: Drainage basin sediment delivery (proceedings of the Albuquerque symposium, August 1986), edited by: Hadley, R., IAHS Publication 159, 69–80, 1986.Van Rompaey, A., Verstraeten, G., Van Oost, K., Govers, G., and Poesen, J.: Modelling mean annual sediment yield using a distributed approach, Earth Surf. Proc. Land, 26, 1221–1236, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.275, 2001.Van Rompaey, A., Vieillefont, V., Jones, R., Montanarella, L., Verstraeten, G., Bazzoffi, P., Dostal, T., Krasa, J., De Vente, J., and Poesen, J.: Validation of soil erosion estimates at European scale, European Soil Bureau Research Report No.13, EUR 20827 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003.Verstraeten, G. and Poesen, J.: Estimating trap efficiency of small reservoirs and ponds: methods and implications for the assessment of sediment yield, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 24, 219–251, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330002400204, 2000.Verstraeten, G. and Poesen, J.: Modelling the long-term sediment trap efficiency of small ponds, Hydrol. Process., 15, 2797–2819, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.269, 2001.Verstraeten, G. and Poesen, J.: Using sediment deposits in small ponds to quantify sediment yield from small catchments: possibilities and limitations, Earth Surf. Proc. Land, 27, 1425–1439, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.439, 2002.Verstraeten, G., Poesen, J., De Vente, J., and Koninckx, X.: Sediment yield variability in Spain: a quantitative and semiqualitative

Extreme Floods in Small Mediterranean Catchments: Long-Term Response to Climate Variability and Change

Climate change implies changes in the frequency and magnitude of flood events. The influence of climate variability on flooding was evaluated by an analysis of sedimentary (palaeofloods) and documentary archives. A 500-year palaeoflood record at Montilea River (657 km(2) in catchment area), eastern Spain, revealed up to 31 palaeofloods with a range of discharges of 20-950 m(3) s(-1), and with at least five floods exceeding 740-950 m(3) s(-1). This information contrasts with the available gauged flood registers (since year 1971) with an annual maximum daily discharge of 129 m(3) s(-1). Our palaeoflood dataset indicates flood cluster episodes at (1) 1570-1620, (2) 1775-1795, (3) 1850-1890, and (4) 1920-1969. Flood rich periods 1 and 3 corresponded to cooler than usual (about 0.3 degrees C and 0.2 degrees C) climate oscillations, whereas 2 and 4 were characterised by higher inter-annual climatic variability (floods and droughts). This high inter-annual rainfall variability increased over the last 150 years, leading to a reduction of annual maximum flow. Flood quantiles (>50 years) calculated from palaeoflood+gauged data showed 30%-40% higher peak discharges than those using only instrumental records, whereas when increasing the catchment area (1500 km(2)) the discharge estimation variance decreased to-15%. The results reflect the higher sensitivity of small catchments to changes on flood magnitude and frequency due to climate variability whereas a larger catchment buffers the response due to the limited extent of convective storms. Our findings show that extended flood records provide robust knowledge about hazardous flooding that can assist in the prioritization of low-regret actions for flood-risk adaptation to climate change

Measurement of the cross-section and charge asymmetry of WW bosons produced in proton-proton collisions at s=8\sqrt{s}=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

This paper presents measurements of the $W^+ \rightarrow \mu^+\nu$ and $W^- \rightarrow \mu^-\nu$ cross-sections and the associated charge asymmetry as a function of the absolute pseudorapidity of the decay muon. The data were collected in proton--proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC and correspond to a total integrated luminosity of 20.2~\mbox{fb^{-1}}. The precision of the cross-section measurements varies between 0.8% to 1.5% as a function of the pseudorapidity, excluding the 1.9% uncertainty on the integrated luminosity. The charge asymmetry is measured with an uncertainty between 0.002 and 0.003. The results are compared with predictions based on next-to-next-to-leading-order calculations with various parton distribution functions and have the sensitivity to discriminate between them.Comment: 38 pages in total, author list starting page 22, 5 figures, 4 tables, submitted to EPJC. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/STDM-2017-13

Search for chargino-neutralino production with mass splittings near the electroweak scale in three-lepton final states in √s=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

A search for supersymmetry through the pair production of electroweakinos with mass splittings near the electroweak scale and decaying via on-shell W and Z bosons is presented for a three-lepton final state. The analyzed proton-proton collision data taken at a center-of-mass energy of √s=13  TeV were collected between 2015 and 2018 by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139  fb−1. A search, emulating the recursive jigsaw reconstruction technique with easily reproducible laboratory-frame variables, is performed. The two excesses observed in the 2015–2016 data recursive jigsaw analysis in the low-mass three-lepton phase space are reproduced. Results with the full data set are in agreement with the Standard Model expectations. They are interpreted to set exclusion limits at the 95% confidence level on simplified models of chargino-neutralino pair production for masses up to 345 GeV

Measurement of χ c1 and χ c2 production with s√ = 7 TeV pp collisions at ATLAS

The prompt and non-prompt production cross-sections for the χ c1 and χ c2 charmonium states are measured in pp collisions at s√ = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC using 4.5 fb−1 of integrated luminosity. The χ c states are reconstructed through the radiative decay χ c → J/ψγ (with J/ψ → μ + μ −) where photons are reconstructed from γ → e + e − conversions. The production rate of the χ c2 state relative to the χ c1 state is measured for prompt and non-prompt χ c as a function of J/ψ transverse momentum. The prompt χ c cross-sections are combined with existing measurements of prompt J/ψ production to derive the fraction of prompt J/ψ produced in feed-down from χ c decays. The fractions of χ c1 and χ c2 produced in b-hadron decays are also measured

Measurement of the production of a W boson in association with a charm quark in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

The production of a W boson in association with a single charm quark is studied using 4.6 fb−1 of pp collision data at s√ = 7 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. In events in which a W boson decays to an electron or muon, the charm quark is tagged either by its semileptonic decay to a muon or by the presence of a charmed meson. The integrated and differential cross sections as a function of the pseudorapidity of the lepton from the W-boson decay are measured. Results are compared to the predictions of next-to-leading-order QCD calculations obtained from various parton distribution function parameterisations. The ratio of the strange-to-down sea-quark distributions is determined to be 0.96+0.26−0.30 at Q 2 = 1.9 GeV2, which supports the hypothesis of an SU(3)-symmetric composition of the light-quark sea. Additionally, the cross-section ratio σ(W + +c¯¯)/σ(W − + c) is compared to the predictions obtained using parton distribution function parameterisations with different assumptions about the s−s¯¯¯ quark asymmetry

Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √ s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Results of a search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses 20.3 fb−1 of √ s = 8 TeV data collected in 2012 with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Events are required to have at least one jet with pT > 120 GeV and no leptons. Nine signal regions are considered with increasing missing transverse momentum requirements between Emiss T > 150 GeV and Emiss T > 700 GeV. Good agreement is observed between the number of events in data and Standard Model expectations. The results are translated into exclusion limits on models with either large extra spatial dimensions, pair production of weakly interacting dark matter candidates, or production of very light gravitinos in a gauge-mediated supersymmetric model. In addition, limits on the production of an invisibly decaying Higgs-like boson leading to similar topologies in the final state are presente

Single hadron response measurement and calorimeter jet energy scale uncertainty with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

The uncertainty on the calorimeter energy response to jets of particles is derived for the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). First, the calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons is measured and compared to the Monte Carlo simulation using proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of sqrt(s) = 900 GeV and 7 TeV collected during 2009 and 2010. Then, using the decay of K_s and Lambda particles, the calorimeter response to specific types of particles (positively and negatively charged pions, protons, and anti-protons) is measured and compared to the Monte Carlo predictions. Finally, the jet energy scale uncertainty is determined by propagating the response uncertainty for single charged and neutral particles to jets. The response uncertainty is 2-5% for central isolated hadrons and 1-3% for the final calorimeter jet energy scale.Comment: 24 pages plus author list (36 pages total), 23 figures, 1 table, submitted to European Physical Journal

Search for high-mass resonances decaying to dilepton final states in pp collisions at s√=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider is used to search for high-mass resonances decaying to an electron-positron pair or a muon-antimuon pair. The search is sensitive to heavy neutral Z′ gauge bosons, Randall-Sundrum gravitons, Z * bosons, techni-mesons, Kaluza-Klein Z/γ bosons, and bosons predicted by Torsion models. Results are presented based on an analysis of pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 4.9 fb−1 in the e + e − channel and 5.0 fb−1 in the μ + μ −channel. A Z ′ boson with Standard Model-like couplings is excluded at 95 % confidence level for masses below 2.22 TeV. A Randall-Sundrum graviton with coupling k/MPl=0.1 is excluded at 95 % confidence level for masses below 2.16 TeV. Limits on the other models are also presented, including Technicolor and Minimal Z′ Models

Measurement of the cross-section of high transverse momentum vector bosons reconstructed as single jets and studies of jet substructure in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

This paper presents a measurement of the cross-section for high transverse momentum W and Z bosons produced in pp collisions and decaying to all-hadronic final states. The data used in the analysis were recorded by the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of √s = 7 TeV;{\rm Te}{\rm V}$and correspond to an integrated luminosity of$4.6\;{\rm f}{{{\rm b}}^{-1}}$. The measurement is performed by reconstructing the boosted W or Z bosons in single jets. The reconstructed jet mass is used to identify the W and Z bosons, and a jet substructure method based on energy cluster information in the jet centre-of-mass frame is used to suppress the large multi-jet background. The cross-section for events with a hadronically decaying W or Z boson, with transverse momentum${{p}_{{\rm T}}}\gt 320\;{\rm Ge}{\rm V}$and pseudorapidity$|\eta |\lt 1.9$, is measured to be${{\sigma }_{W+Z}}=8.5\pm 1.7$ pb and is compared to next-to-leading-order calculations. The selected events are further used to study jet grooming techniques